Skip to main content

THE ‘AH-HA!’ MOMENT Exploring Philosophical Ideas through Jokes and Puzzles

 

 Why you’ve got to laugh…

Okay, you say you don’t want to. That the world is looking pretty awful these days:  there’s a an actual genocide in Gaza, in America a mafia ‘don’ (or should I say ‘Don’) is plundering the country’s treasury and having opponents bundled off the street and imprisoned in far-away hell-holes… so is there any point to a book on jokes?

Well, naturally enough, a lot of people don't think so. But this book is not actually a joke book (though it uses a lot for illustration)it's actually a more sociological study of both the role and mechanisms of humour.

But it’s not pompous – it’s a lot of fun. That’s why the reviews editor at the Sun, the UK’s largest selling tabloid gave it a four star review (that’s the max) and called it the ultimate “feel good” book, while Talk Radio Europe crowned it grandly “the funniest book on philosophy ever written”. Okay, the full quote included the word “probably” but still!

So what's this book about – and why, apart from some good jokes, might you enjoy reading it?

Well, when you think about it, a good joke requires, demands, a very special kind of deep thinking - a kind of world-upturning, no-holds-barred problem solving. It's the same skill that produces the great insights of art and commerce, the insight that sees solutions and creates opportunities. And yes, such skills can be approached through exercises and study, but there's no good reason to think such sensible methods work any better than having a sense of humour. 

So why not, at least for a moment, throw all conventional thinking to the wind, and start re-examining the world through the very special, very beautiful prism of jokes and riddles?

Oh, and here for starters, is one of my favourite jokes. It’s joke number three in the book. There are lots more!


Sherlock Holmes Goes Camping…

The famous detective, Sherlock Holmes, and his indefatigable assistant, Mr. Watson, go on a camping trip. In the middle of the night, Holmes, ever a light sleeper, wakes up, and stares up at the night sky with thousands of stars twinkling down on them. Holmes, renowned for his own powers of deduction, leans over and nudges Watson: ‘Watson! Wake up! Look around and tell me what you see!’
Watson rubs his eyes and says: ‘Well, Holmes, I can see many uncountable millions of stars stretching away as far as the eye can see.’
‘And what do you deduce from that?’
‘Why.... that the universe is incomprehensibly old and vast.’
‘Very good, Watson! Is there anything else though?’‘Uh, well, Holmes, yes, meteorologically speaking, I deduce that tomorrow will be slightly warmer than today with fine clear skies.’
‘Excellent, Watson! But is there anything else - perhaps more practical - that we can deduce immediately?’
‘Certainly Holmes. we can deduce from the position of the Great Bear that it is now a little after 3.00 a.m. Now what, may I ask, do you deduce, Holmes – and then please can we go back to sleep?’
‘Watson, you fool, the wind has blown our tent away!’

The joke is nicely philosophical because it says that understanding the world hinges on having first adopted the right kind of perspective. It’s a lesson that is also central to the success of many jokes. All Watson’s observations are logically ‘valid’ - but only Holmes’s deduction is useful.

The important distinction is not between ‘valid’ and ‘invalid’ arguments (which is a mathematical matter any fool or computer can be taught to recognise) but between ‘sound’ and ‘unsound’ ones - a difference which requires sensitivity to background knowledge and context. Yet how often do you hear people classifying positions as logical and illogical, as compared to sound and unsound? Logical language has the grandeur that we need jokes to provide an antidote to, to strip away the pretensions of those who offer sophisticated explanations for phenomena when simple ones will do. Philosophers beware!

Other chapters cover the role of political jokes in both Russia and the USA, whether women have a different sense of humour, why ANIMALS definitely do – and practical advice on stand-up from an expert.

Grab a copy! 

 THE ‘AH-HA!’ MOMENT - Direct from the publisher!

Or via Amazon  THE ‘AH-HA!’ MOMENT


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking Thinking

By Martin Cohen I’ve been thinking  lot about thinking a lot! This book is pretty much a summary of my thoughts over thirty years… Tip One , via Sun Tzu’s classic text,  The Art of War , is don’t do things the clever way, nor even  the smart way: do them the easy way. Because it doesn’t matter what you’re wondering about, or researching or doing - someone else has probably solved the problem for you already. Google it, get the book, find the answer. Tip Two is to avoid ‘black and white’ thinking, binary distinctions, ‘yes/no’ language and questions, and instead take the tip from ‘design thinking’ that approaches rooted in notions of questions and answers are themselves limiting insight and that it is sometimes better to go for narratives. Tip Three , which, yes, is connected to the previous tips, and that’s a good thing too,  is to look for the pattern in the data. However, there’s a caution that has to come with advice to  pattern match, because as we become at...

Chewing over FOOD!

Readers who know my strong slant towards FRUIT AND VEG in I Think Therefore I Eat, will maybe be puzzled to find me taking on the vegans recently. Nonetheless, that is where I felt the truth of the extraordinarily complex food arguments lies and philosophy takes us where the truth is whether we like it or not! The Observer (London) even accused me of waging ‘culture wars’ and wondered: Is it possible that a combination of well-meaning philanthropists and large agricultural concerns have united to exploit health fears for financial gain, while neglecting the nutritional shortcomings in their recommendations? Anyway, in the event I was delighted to work with the brilliant Frédéric Leroy on this article, which basically follows up a request he received from the influential European Food Agency to raise public awareness about the complexity of food issues and the implicatons of simple ‘one size fits all’ solutions. Our piece kicked off a public information campaign which i...

Puzzling over Philosophy Problems

When it first came out way back in the last century (sighs) 101 Philosophy Problems was quite an iconoclast. Up to then, the most radical book of philosophy was Bertrand’s Problems of Philosophy , and that book splits the problems into boring categories like logic and epistemology ... So I knew, as a young(ish) philosophy teacher, there was room for a new look at the subject, and 101 PP was it. In time it went on to  sell (I think) about 250 000 copies in about 20 languages. I don’t know for sure as the publisher, Routledge, seemed to think it was a bit vulgar to keep track of things such as sales figures, although they gave me a nice lunch in London! Here's a taste of the book, a problem that up to then had been summed up as a  landmark philosophical problem concerning our understanding of descriptive knowledge situated somewhere the field of epistemology ... but I reinvented as simply the Problem of the Cow in the Field: Farmer Field is concerned about his pri...