Skip to main content

Agonizing over Ethics

Mind you, calling ethics ‘agonizing’ maybe puts the thing on the wrong footing. Because this book, the follow-up to 101 Philosophy Problems, is great fun. It surprised my very shrewd Routledge editor, Tony, who hesitated over the idea saying that hardly any one read ethics and we didn’t want to tie 101 Philosophy Problems to a lead balloon.

But as anyone who has read both books will know, there’s plenty of overlap between a philosophy problem and an ethical dilemma. The thinking is the same and if presented as riddles, they can appeal to the same audience.
Ethics is about choices which matter, and choices which matter are dilemmas. the Greek word means 'two horns'. ... But ethics is a deep well, and once you start to lower the bucket, there comes no obvious jolt to tell you that at last it has reached the bottom.
Actually, despite Tony's initial doubts, 101 Ethical Dilemmas went on to be one of my most successful titles, selling I think about 150 000 copies and going again into about 15 foreign editions. That may not sound a lot to writers of pop fiction but for a serious academic study of ethics, it, well, changed the rules of the game.

Again, for people interested in such things, I didn't really get much money for the book, but I did enjoy writing it, and I was even a keynote speaker at a state-run, meaning Communist Party run, Conference on the Environment: Yunnan Province, China. My topic was: How Indigenous Rights and Ecological Duties go Hand-in-Hand.

The paper I gave, and no I wasn't put up to do this, I could have done anything I wanted, looked at the way the European settlers in Australia had systematically exterminated both the indigenous people of the land and the animal populations. (Later on, I'd also write about specific cases of genocide in my ‘black armband’ alternative travel guidebook No Holiday.) However, 101 Ethical Dilemmas particularly looked at the question of species and extinction - what value does a species have? Why do we put so little resources into saving them? But I also noted in the book the link to human society.. narrow social interests often trump wider ecological values.

Anyway, it was a great conference (big shout out to Professor Lisa Wang for organising my trip! And much else besides... ) and I will always remember the warm and open way the Chinese received these controversial ideas. By contrast, when I gave a similar paper in Australia at a conference at Queensland University of Technology a former member of the Queensland government stood up and insisted that I be prevented from continuing, and (get this) the chair of the meeting agreed with him! He said to me, the person about five minutes into a half hour presentation, ‘you’ve had your say, now let’s hear some views from the audience’. So there was no room for this debate in Australia and yet there was in communist China. It all goes to underline a key ethical principle, don't believe what's written on the tin, check out the contents of the tin itself.

So, ethics, as I approached it, is a series of perplexing riddles and challenging debates, not at all the way it is taught in universities and schools as 'platitudes' and logical rules.

* This was a more hopeful, open China. A sad contrast with recent policy which has led to the terrible events going on in Xinjiang today... but as Ian Keith recently argued, China remains crucial to preserving global biodiversity.

Popular posts from this blog

Rethinking Thinking

By Martin Cohen I’ve been thinking  lot about thinking a lot! This book is pretty much a summary of my thoughts over thirty years… Tip One , via Sun Tzu’s classic text,  The Art of War , is don’t do things the clever way, nor even  the smart way: do them the easy way. Because it doesn’t matter what you’re wondering about, or researching or doing - someone else has probably solved the problem for you already. Google it, get the book, find the answer. Tip Two is to avoid ‘black and white’ thinking, binary distinctions, ‘yes/no’ language and questions, and instead take the tip from ‘design thinking’ that approaches rooted in notions of questions and answers are themselves limiting insight and that it is sometimes better to go for narratives. Tip Three , which, yes, is connected to the previous tips, and that’s a good thing too,  is to look for the pattern in the data. However, there’s a caution that has to come with advice to  pattern match, because as we become attentive to some characte

Chewing over FOOD!

Readers who know my strong slant towards FRUIT AND VEG in I Think Therefore I Eat, will maybe be puzzled to find me taking on the vegans recently. Nonetheless, that is where I felt the truth of the extraordinarily complex food arguments lies and philosophy takes us where the truth is whether we like it or not! The Observer (London) even accused me of waging ‘culture wars’ and wondered: Is it possible that a combination of well-meaning philanthropists and large agricultural concerns have united to exploit health fears for financial gain, while neglecting the nutritional shortcomings in their recommendations? Anyway, in the event I was delighted to work with the brilliant Frédéric Leroy on this article, which basically follows up a request he received from the influential European Food Agency to raise public awareness about the complexity of food issues and the implicatons of simple ‘one size fits all’ solutions. Our piece kicked off a public information campaign which i

Playing Mind Games

This is also one of my favorite books, with another wonderful cover by Zolumio (also artist for 101 Philosophy Problems edition 3 and 101 Ethical Dilemmas Edition 2) , and although it didn't have quite the impact of the 101s, it does nonetheless have a very enthusiastic and dare I say, select following across numerous international editions. Indeed, it was translated into French (the French are very picky about ‘their’ philosophy books) and featured on their much-admired station, France Culture. (French speakers can enjoy the show  here . ) The point about Mind Games , and hey, does the title give a clue or does it just sound like the Joh Lennon song? is that it is about how the mind works, and this is a very interesting area and particularly so when approached non-technically and with a philosophical spirit of openness to ‘possibilities’. This is thus, philosophy but with a very different set of experts along with some of the usual philosophical names. There's Fre